Shareholder Activism

According to Ernesto Hernández-López, shareholder activism refers to any action a shareholder may take, based on his/her right as a shareholder, with the objective of influencing the management of the corporation. An activist shareholder’s role is to exert push onto management when they believe management is doing a poor job. They can do so by asking the management to disclose issues and urge action either by suggesting them to change a procedure/policy or even demand to substitute the board of directors.

Some economists favor activism and consider it to be an essential aspect for long term success of an organization (if employed properly). Even if the activist investor is dormant, the company stays vigilant. Recently, AT&T board was attacked by a hedge fund manager at Elliot Management Corporation, also recognized as one of the aggressive activist investors in the market. Elliot laid out its concerns to the board about its expensive acquisitions that left AT&T with more than $160 billion debt and put forth plans to cut costs and focus on returns. According to Elliott, AT&T can boost its profit margins by asset sales, cutting costs by outsourcing some functions and reducing the number of retail stores which could increase the share value to $60 from current $38 by 2021. Elliott owns only approximately 1% of $260 billion AT&T market value which means, it probably needs support from other investors to pressure the company. But AT&T has given a statement saying they will consider Elliott’s perspective and gain control of the market.

However, on the other hand, organizations complain that activists are focused only on short-term interests and force them to hit immediate profits that don’t sustain. Hedge fund activists particularly are known to have short time limits than other investors. As a result of the pressure, organizations are forced to engage in stock buy backs, layoffs, etc. to see a temporary rise in stock value. These quick short-term profits are questionable and impact the firm. In my opinion, investors need to evaluate whether the company decisions influence long-term benefits or not. More thoughts about hedge fund activists in my next blog entry.

Comments

Two Sides of Corporate Social Responsibility

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) -- it is the hottest topic out there. Should we trust that companies live up their values or there are any underlying motives? But, let's first start by exploring the definition of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). It is defined as the commitment of business to contribute to sustainable economic development, working with employees, their families, the local community and society at large to improve their quality of life ( World Business Council on Sustainable Development, 2000 ). So, CSR is based on the belief that companies make positive contributions to society. Some examples of CSR activities that organizations participate to be socially responsible are as follows: Philanthropic CSR- Companies donate to the needy via charities. Their donations include clean water programs, helping those affected by natural disaster etc. Environmental CSR- It is very important to limit pollution. Companies participate in CSR by lim...

Rethinking SWOT Analysis.....

“Traditional SWOT analysis” … SWOT analysis is a powerful tool that is used by companies to build business strategies. It stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. SWOT analysis is usually done in an organized way using a 2*2 grid like pattern. By observing where they are, companies can develop strategies that help them to stand out from the rest. Strengths Strengths are positive attributes of a company. These are internal factors and can be controlled. The following questions help to identify strengths: What do you do better than others? What do customers/competitors see in you as your strengths? What physical assets or human capital do you see as strengths? What is the advantage that you have that competitors don’t? etc Weaknesses Weaknesses are negative attributes and can weaken strengths of the company. These are internal factors and can be modified for betterment. The following questions help to identify weakness: What issues c...

Managing Older Workforce

I recently listened a "HBR podcast" series on how to manage older people at work .These days, managers need to adapt to different kind of generations seen in workforce and act accordingly. It was mentioned that there are 5 generations in workplace today and methods that work with Gen X/Z may not work with millennials and vice versa. Expectations also change based on times and norms of that era. One of the trends being seen at workplace these days is younger managers with people under them who are much older and experienced and managing these “older” people requires additional care on the part of managers. The podcast talked about three cases pertaining to older generations and how they perceived, areas of age, experience, modern technology tools, etc. and how their views are the source of frustration for their younger counterparts. Managing of the diverse workforce and changing workforce demographics are related to strategic human resources management. Managers ...

Kaivalyam

Search This Blog